.
Jack M. Beck ·
Allen
West could not have diagnosed the case any better. Although so true,
this will not phase the immigrant legal, or illegal voting block. And as
far as the ordinary rank and file street people, voters or non-voters,
they could borrow Hell-ry's classic remark, " What difference does it
make". There is only numbness between their ears. P. S. If Allen West
doesn't become a future presidential candidate, I would be surprised and
disappointed even though I might not live long enough (89 years young
now) to see it.
Scott Collins ·
Works at Prestonwood Baptist Church
I
agree with Allen. Comey's actions has succeeded in making the November
election a referendum on the legacy of Obama and the Clintons. We
finally have a chance of putting the last 25 years behind us. Finally!
Todd Smekens ·
Allen,
I was with you right up until you connected "socialists" with the
corrupted "Democratic Party". Apparently, you've not been paying
attention to how Bernie Sanders, the only honest politician running for
POTUS, is challenging the Wall Street owned democrats in Washington.
Progressives across the country have been attacking Clinton when she declared herself a "progressive who likes to get things done."
Like many "useful idiots" who believe the government is running this country, as opposed to merely being puppets of Wealthy Elites, you're just taking a bunch of other idiots deeper into the forest where you'll wonder for 40 years.
Either a it's intentional or just laziness.
Progressives across the country have been attacking Clinton when she declared herself a "progressive who likes to get things done."
Like many "useful idiots" who believe the government is running this country, as opposed to merely being puppets of Wealthy Elites, you're just taking a bunch of other idiots deeper into the forest where you'll wonder for 40 years.
Either a it's intentional or just laziness.
Sharon Hendrickson Dillsaver
Allen
West, thank you so much, that is exactly what I said. Leave her alone
and we will beat her. Thank you for making me think I am a little bit
smart.
Lou Desser ·
The classified material was not clearly indicated as being classified. Thus, she would not know of the classified status.
Kathy Young ·
dear
Sir, "cool aide drinking whatevers," but you most certainly were not in
the SF bay area when Berkely was 'happening'. I hate to bust your
bubble but the Leftist collegiates were not "cool aide drinking" (LSD
heads). The "lsd" heads did not like them, did not hang out with them,
but were a different part of the "counter culture", with different and
a-political interests: different types of people here. Just because they
intermingled sometimes, due to the area and rock concerts, did not make
the people who used LSD, far leftist subversives.
In fact the far leftist subversives were the collegiates and only looked like the "hippies" because it was a style or trend. But they did not think like them. In fact the far left disdained the so called hippies whose motivations were not far left, but cultural (rock music/smoking pot/getting laid/partying/creative/non political). The far leftists that were the atheist collegiates were political animals who bought into the Weishaupt program of subversive communist socialism and political sabotauge. I was there, I saw it all, and studied the old films of both movements.
If the atheist collegiates had seriously indulged in the LSD as you imagine, they would not have bought into the going subversive political movement of the dangerous antisocial Weathermen and the Black Panthers, but more likely to go to the concerts and get high on cannibis and party. The hippies were not of the age of the collegiates but right out of high school, generally not college kids, poorer, maybe art/music students, with time on their hands due to an influx of their population right out of high school but without any jobs to sate them (low job rate at the time)--these were not the collegiates; the collegiate atheist leftists looked down their noses at the "hippies" who were lower class than they were, more spiritual, and not the wealthier collegiates a notch above them on the social ladder.
But these atheist far leftist subversive types were career oriented politically ambitious disrupters and dissidents. And they did not actually identify with the hippies and the hippies did not identify with them and pretty much avoided them (except in the area of the draft sometimes). I think it is very important to know this, because in sluffing this overly zealous and ambitious subversiveness off on the larger more unambitious younger group of hippies, is underestimating the smaller population of the Real Enemy as if they are a bunch of layabout self indulgent brats wallowing in foolishness. That is not the case with these subversives, who are dangerous and sinister, not happy-go-lucky hippies, but determined political deviants who intend to destroy the fabric of our country and the relationships of our people, and have succeeded in doing so, with their typically communist divide and conquer agenda.
After the Berkely uprisings, the Weathermen, who were likely ilfiltrated with or started by the original European communists, used the dumber or more naive atheist collegiate political-animals to create havoc and dissention and who went on to become our journalists and professors and teachers, bringing their subversive ideologies with them, to indoctrinate the nation's children with their atheist ideology. Nevertheless the hippies did not buy into their boring bulls..t, and mostly avoided those snobs, different types of folks. And now nobody knows where this all started, this so called socialism? But I do. To this day I find them irksome and irreligious, always looking down their snooty noses at their poorer "not so well educated" (non-collegiate) lessers. Give us a break. They are horrible snobs now, and always were.
Now Obummer is definitely a communist subversive saboteur with that same profile, but Chillary seems to be just a normal old fashioned sociopath who exhibits the bad judgment typical to sociopaths, who seems to be being used by Obummer for his communist agenda to divide and conquer our nation. It has occurred to me that the Clintons are typical sociopathic racketeers who got on the map in DC by means of their cocaine distribution in the eighties, which coke was very popular then and on into the nineties. This could be still why they insist on open borders? They do not seem to be true subversives, but more like the Al Capone type of Bonnie and Clyde racketeers who by means of their coke distribution likely infiltrated and compromised many DC-ites. For instance, Comey, with his long supportive association with the Clintons even during their dope running days thirty years ago, (see my other posts): I would bet you anything, he snorted a line or two with the Clintons on a regular basis, then. These "patrons" went on to become professional bureaucrats in DC, probably like Lynch, maybe, and so these "compromised" bureaucrats that fill DC are essentially of their cartel from the beginning. This cartel was money oriented, and not a true subversive leftist underground group like the weathermen.
In fact the far leftist subversives were the collegiates and only looked like the "hippies" because it was a style or trend. But they did not think like them. In fact the far left disdained the so called hippies whose motivations were not far left, but cultural (rock music/smoking pot/getting laid/partying/creative/non political). The far leftists that were the atheist collegiates were political animals who bought into the Weishaupt program of subversive communist socialism and political sabotauge. I was there, I saw it all, and studied the old films of both movements.
If the atheist collegiates had seriously indulged in the LSD as you imagine, they would not have bought into the going subversive political movement of the dangerous antisocial Weathermen and the Black Panthers, but more likely to go to the concerts and get high on cannibis and party. The hippies were not of the age of the collegiates but right out of high school, generally not college kids, poorer, maybe art/music students, with time on their hands due to an influx of their population right out of high school but without any jobs to sate them (low job rate at the time)--these were not the collegiates; the collegiate atheist leftists looked down their noses at the "hippies" who were lower class than they were, more spiritual, and not the wealthier collegiates a notch above them on the social ladder.
But these atheist far leftist subversive types were career oriented politically ambitious disrupters and dissidents. And they did not actually identify with the hippies and the hippies did not identify with them and pretty much avoided them (except in the area of the draft sometimes). I think it is very important to know this, because in sluffing this overly zealous and ambitious subversiveness off on the larger more unambitious younger group of hippies, is underestimating the smaller population of the Real Enemy as if they are a bunch of layabout self indulgent brats wallowing in foolishness. That is not the case with these subversives, who are dangerous and sinister, not happy-go-lucky hippies, but determined political deviants who intend to destroy the fabric of our country and the relationships of our people, and have succeeded in doing so, with their typically communist divide and conquer agenda.
After the Berkely uprisings, the Weathermen, who were likely ilfiltrated with or started by the original European communists, used the dumber or more naive atheist collegiate political-animals to create havoc and dissention and who went on to become our journalists and professors and teachers, bringing their subversive ideologies with them, to indoctrinate the nation's children with their atheist ideology. Nevertheless the hippies did not buy into their boring bulls..t, and mostly avoided those snobs, different types of folks. And now nobody knows where this all started, this so called socialism? But I do. To this day I find them irksome and irreligious, always looking down their snooty noses at their poorer "not so well educated" (non-collegiate) lessers. Give us a break. They are horrible snobs now, and always were.
Now Obummer is definitely a communist subversive saboteur with that same profile, but Chillary seems to be just a normal old fashioned sociopath who exhibits the bad judgment typical to sociopaths, who seems to be being used by Obummer for his communist agenda to divide and conquer our nation. It has occurred to me that the Clintons are typical sociopathic racketeers who got on the map in DC by means of their cocaine distribution in the eighties, which coke was very popular then and on into the nineties. This could be still why they insist on open borders? They do not seem to be true subversives, but more like the Al Capone type of Bonnie and Clyde racketeers who by means of their coke distribution likely infiltrated and compromised many DC-ites. For instance, Comey, with his long supportive association with the Clintons even during their dope running days thirty years ago, (see my other posts): I would bet you anything, he snorted a line or two with the Clintons on a regular basis, then. These "patrons" went on to become professional bureaucrats in DC, probably like Lynch, maybe, and so these "compromised" bureaucrats that fill DC are essentially of their cartel from the beginning. This cartel was money oriented, and not a true subversive leftist underground group like the weathermen.
Don Wagoner ·
Works at Self Employed/Semi Retired
The FIX is in!
Please help me get all of this straight! Our Muslim President wants to be appointed to the Supreme Court after his term is up, correct? In order for this to happen the only person that can make this possible is Hillary.
At the same time our F.B.I. Director and our Attorney General are lobbying to keep their jobs under a Clinton Presidency. In order for this to happen Hillary cannot be indicted on any of her criminal charges without being ineligible to run for POTUS.
Hillary sends her husband a former impeached President for a sit down or stand up meeting with the Attorney General to assure her that both her job and the F.B.I. directors jobs are secure by not indicting his wife.
The F.B.I. director gives a 20 minute speech explaining all of her wrong doings but cannot recommend an indictment hoping to preserve his integrity with the voters and of course if Hillary is elected hopefully keeping his job.
Our Attorney General has already been assured of her job by complying with Clinton's directions from her husband at a secret meeting which was made public because of a nosy reporter actually doing his or her job and reporting the duration of the meeting.
Is there anything I have missed in this jigsaw puzzle of events? Oh yes there is, no sooner did all of these pieces fall into place and magically our Muslim President invited Hillary to join him on Air Force One for a speech in North Carolina.
With Obama's endorsement Hillary is assured the possibility of being the first female President allowing her to ask our Attorney General and our F.B.I. director if they would like to keep their jobs.
Oh yes! and also sending to the Senate for approval her choice for the Supreme Court Barack Hussein Obama. Please let me know if I have missed anything. Nothing has changed Donald J. Trump will still be getting our votes!
The only thing we do not know is how much money has been exchanged to pay for the FIX!
Please help me get all of this straight! Our Muslim President wants to be appointed to the Supreme Court after his term is up, correct? In order for this to happen the only person that can make this possible is Hillary.
At the same time our F.B.I. Director and our Attorney General are lobbying to keep their jobs under a Clinton Presidency. In order for this to happen Hillary cannot be indicted on any of her criminal charges without being ineligible to run for POTUS.
Hillary sends her husband a former impeached President for a sit down or stand up meeting with the Attorney General to assure her that both her job and the F.B.I. directors jobs are secure by not indicting his wife.
The F.B.I. director gives a 20 minute speech explaining all of her wrong doings but cannot recommend an indictment hoping to preserve his integrity with the voters and of course if Hillary is elected hopefully keeping his job.
Our Attorney General has already been assured of her job by complying with Clinton's directions from her husband at a secret meeting which was made public because of a nosy reporter actually doing his or her job and reporting the duration of the meeting.
Is there anything I have missed in this jigsaw puzzle of events? Oh yes there is, no sooner did all of these pieces fall into place and magically our Muslim President invited Hillary to join him on Air Force One for a speech in North Carolina.
With Obama's endorsement Hillary is assured the possibility of being the first female President allowing her to ask our Attorney General and our F.B.I. director if they would like to keep their jobs.
Oh yes! and also sending to the Senate for approval her choice for the Supreme Court Barack Hussein Obama. Please let me know if I have missed anything. Nothing has changed Donald J. Trump will still be getting our votes!
The only thing we do not know is how much money has been exchanged to pay for the FIX!
William Helwig ·
THE
FACT IS THAT EVERY PERSON IN THE UNITED STATES NOW FALLS ONLY INTO ONE
OF TWO ‘POLITICAL GROUPS’. IT IS KNOW LONGER REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS;
IT IS CONSTITUTIONALIST VS MARXIST. THE CONSTITUTION IS THE ONLY
DOCUMENT EVER WRITTEN AND ADOPTED THAT CONVEYS RIGHTS TO THE INDIVIDUAL
AND IT REQUIRES GOVERNMENT TO BE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE. WHEN YOU
VOTE THIS NOVEMBER 2016 AND IN THE FUTURE, MAKE SURE YOU ARE VOTING FOR A
CONSTITUTIONALIST AND NOT A MARXIST. THERE IS NO IN BETWEEN, OUR
ECONOMIC FREEDOM, SOVEREIGNTY AND WAY OF LIFE DEPENDS HOW YOU VOTE !!!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment